1. Qt Signal Slot Between Classes List
2. Qt Signal Slot Thread
3. Qt Signals And Slots Tutorial
4. Qt Signal Slot Between Classes Chart
5. Qt Signal Slot Example

• Remember that connections are not between classes, but between instances. If you emit a signal and expect connected slots to be called, it must be emitted on an instance on which the connection was made.
• Royal Panda reserves the right to change the Signals And Slots Between Classes terms and conditions of its promotions at any time. In the event of conflicting information, Signals And Slots Between Classes the information described in the terms and conditions for Royal Panda promotions and bonuses shall prevail over any descriptions provided in Royal Panda’s promotions and bonuses explained.

Hi, I want to create a connection between a signal and slot, which are in different classes. @Mogli123 said in signal slot between 2 classes: // I'm not shure how to do that. I'm very new in cpp and qt and don't know how to solve that problem. Can you give me a small example please?

published at 20.08.2015 15:28 by Jens Weller

This is the 7th blog post in my series about writing applications with C++ using Qt and boost. This time it is about how to notify one part of our application that something has happened somewhere else. I will start with Qt, as it brings with signals and slots a mechanism to do exactly that. But, as I have the goal not to use Qt mainly in the UI Layer, I will also look on how to notify other parts of the application, when things are changing. The last episode was about QWidgets and data.

The video for this episode:

Signals and Events in Qt

But lets start with Qt. Qt offers two different systems for our needs, Qt signal/slot and QEvents. While Qt signal/slot is the moc driven signaling system of Qt (which you can connect to via QObject::connect), there is a second Event interface informing you about certain system-like events, such as QMouseEvent, QKeyEvent or QFocusEvent. Usually you have to overwrite a method to receive such events, or use an event filter, like I showed in my last post for QFocusEvents. Some classes translate QEvents to signals, such as the TreeView, which has a signal for displaying context menus. But as this blog post is more on signaling then system events...

Qt has had its own signaling mechanism for a long time now, so when you use Qt, you also will use QSignals. Qt also uses its own keywords for this: signals, slots and emit. There is an option to turn this of, and use the macros Q_SIGNAL/S,Q_SLOT/S and Q_EMIT instead: CONFIG += no_keywords. This allows to use 3rd party libraries which use these terms, e.g. boost::signal. Qt signal/slot implementation is thread safe, so that you can use it to send messages between different QThreads, this is especially important, as anything UI related should run in the main thread of Qt, anything that could block your UI should not run in this thread, so running jobs in a QThreadPool and emitting the finished result as a signal is a common pattern. Maybe I will touch this in a later post...

For now, lets see the basics of using signals and slots in Qt. This is the code from my MainWindow class constructor, connecting several signals to slots:

So, the traditional, moc driven connect method is QObject* derived sender, the SIGNAL macro defining the signal to connect to, followed by the QObject* derived receiver, then SLOT(...) is the last argument, naming the slot to connect to. There is a fifth defaultet parameter: the ConnectionType. The last line contains the new, lambda based connection option, where you again have the sender and its slot, this time as a method-pointer, and then followed by a lambda acting as the receiving slot.

This syntax can lead to a rare error, when ever a signal is overloaded, like QComboBox::currentIndexChanged, which is available with an int or QString parameter. Then you'll need an ugly static_cast to tell the compiler which version you'd like:

In this case I didn't even needed the argument from the slot. It is fairly easy to use your own signals and slots, all you need is a QObject derived class, which is processed by the moc. Mostly of course you already have classes derived from QObject indirectly, which then use signals and slots, like the page panel class:

So, slots and signals are normal member functions, declared after the qt-specific keyword signals/slots. When you want to emit a signal, its enough to just write 'emit my_signal();', and all observers on this signal will get notified. Slots are often used to react to certain events in the UI, like the currentIndexChanged signal in this case. In the widget editor of QtCreator you get an overview of available signals when right clicking and selecting 'go to slot...', this will create a slot for this signal in your QWidget derived class.

There is also the option to map certain widgets to certain values when a signal fires, this is done via QSignalMapper. I use this in a different program to have one widget for editing flag like settings, where each flag is a bit in a settings value:

Qt Signal Slot Between Classes List

The constructor only takes a QStringList for the option names, and an int for how many columns of check boxes the current use case should have. The QSignalMapper is a member variable, and each QCheckBox connects its clicked signal to the map() slot of QSignalMapper. With setMapping the connection between the sender and the value is set up. QSignalMapper offers int, QObject*, QWidget* and QString as mapping values. QVariant or a generic interface is not provided by Qt. In the clicked slot I simply toggle the bit for the corresponding flag.

When working in Qt, most of it types provide support for signals and slots through deriving from QObject, which offers connect/disconnect methods to manage your slot connections. This brings again the disadvantages of QObject and the moc, as templates can't be used in this context, all classes using signal/slot must be concrete classes. Deriving your classes from templates (CRTP e.g.) can help here to mix in a generic layer.

While Qt is fairly well prepared to manage its own messaging needs, what alternatives exist, that could be used in the non Qt related code? The C++ standard offers currently only std::function, which can be used to implement a callback mechanism. But this has its limitations, of a 1:1 or 1:many connection this is a viable option. I use it to notify my MainWindow class that a node in the tree has changed its name. Also its useful to implement classes which execute a callback in a certain context, like EventFilter in the last blog post in this series. But std::function is not an implementation of the observer pattern, and implementing your own with it would be reinventing the wheel. Boost has had for a long time a signal library, which now is available as version 2: boost::signals2.

Using boost::signals2

Honestly, if I could avoid using signals2, I would, as it has one certain disadvantage: build times increase. So far my project is kind of small, has only a few classes, which most of are less then 100 loc. Adding boost::signals2 to a class makes it hard to build a project quickly for debugging or just seeing if the work of the past hour still compiles.

The need for signals2 came in my application, when I began to understand, that there are some events, which go from the Qt layer into the boost/standard C++ layer, and then need to travel back into the Qt layer. Each Page has a shared_ptr to a layout object, which is part of a LayoutItem holding the list of layouts for a document. There is one LayoutPanel to edit, create and delete layouts in LayoutItem, and each PagePanel has a QComboBox, so that the user can select the layout for the page. Now, when a user creates/renames a layout, each PagePanel needs to be notified, but when it gets deleted, also page needs to change. This could be implemented in the Qt layer, each Qt class involved has access to the boost/C++ layer, and can make the necessary changes. But then, this important business logic of removing a layout will only work through the UI. When I use boost::signals2, it can be done in the boost/standard C++ layer.

boost::signals2 has a signal template, which has the signature as the argument, this signal type also then has the typedef for the slot type, signal::connect returns a connection object:

When ever an object subscribes to the layout signals, it must to so for all three, the vector should invoke RVO. Currently, PagePanel is the only subscriber, it simply connects to the signals using boost::bind:

One detail here is, that I do use scoped_connection, which will call disconnect() on its destruction, while the default boost::signals2::connection class does not. scoped_connection can be moved, but not copied. But once it is in the vector, it will stay there. Also, you should forward declare the connection classes, so that you don't have to include the boost/signals2.hpp headers, this prevents leaking into other sources.

But boost::signals2 can do far more. I have no use for code that depends on the order of slots called, but you can specify this with signal::contect(int group, slot):

In some context it is interesting to handle the return value of a signal, for this boost::signal2 offers a combiner, which is the second template parameter to signal: signal<float(float,float), aggregate_combiner<std::vector<float> > >. This combiner then also overwrites the return value of the signal, which is now std::vector instead of float. Another feature is that you can block a connection with shared_connection_block.

boost::signal2 is currently header only, thread safe and offers a few more customization points, for example you can change the mutex, but also the signature type, which currently is boost::function.

Alternatives to boost::signals2

If you know very well what you are doing, you could use boost::signal instead of its new version, signals2. This might improve your compile times, but boost::signals is not any more maintained. Also, while signals2 is header-only, signals is not. The thread safety is a key feature of signals2, which at some time sooner or later will come into play in your code base. I don't want to introduce a 3rd party library into my project just to have signaling/observer pattern, but you should know, that there are a few alternatives (I googled that too):

• libsigslot
  • has open bugs from 2003 - 2011, memory leaks and other issues. But seems to do the job.
• libsigc++
  • a standard C++ implementation, inspired by Qt, you (might) have to derive your objects from a base class. Virtual function calls are the base of this library it seems, at least for method slots, which the call has to be derived from sigc::trackable.
  • gtkmm and glibmm seem to use this for their signaling needs.
  • the 5 open bugs seem to be feature requests mostly (and nil is a keyword in Object-C, well...)
  • the library has been rewritten using modern C++ idioms (claims the site)
• This codeproject article from 2005 gives some insights, but C++11 changes some of them I think.
• slimsig
  • seems to be a header only alternative to boost::signals2
  • 2 open bugs, no change in one year
• boost::synapse
  • this library is proposed for boost, but has not yet been reviewed.
  • I think it could be a more lightweight alternative to signals2
  • Currently its not threadsafe.

The only disadvantage of boost::signal2 is really its impact on compile and link time, which can be reduced through pimple and other isolation techniques, so that a recompilation is only triggered when really needed. One idea which came in my mind during this blog post is a std_signal2 header, which replaces the boost types (function, mutex etc.) with the corresponding std types. I'm not sure how this would work out, but boost::signals2 seems to be pretty well build to do this, a lot of template parameters have default values which then configure the library, and are hidden from the day to day usage.

Join the Meeting C++ patreon community!
This and other posts on Meeting C++ are enabled by my supporters on patreon!

Copyright Meetingcpp GmbH 2020 ImprintPiwik Opt outPrivacy Policy

making changes in one component trigger behavior in another. You can trigger behaviors in response to user input, such as button presses or text input, or events in your own code.SearchComments: signalTags:Video: 337608027/137c732675Duration: 10IsPremium: TrueCollection: startCollectionIndex: 1

Build complex application behaviors using signals and slots, and override widget event handling with custom events.

As already described, every interaction the user has with a Qt application causes an Event. There are multiple types of event, each representing a difference type of interaction — e.g. mouse or keyboard events.

Events that occur are passed to the event-specific handler on the widget where the interaction occurred. For example, clicking on a widget will cause a QMouseEvent to be sent to the .mousePressEvent event handler on the widget. This handler can interrogate the event to find out information, such as what triggered the event and where specifically it occurred.

You can intercept events by subclassing and overriding the handler function on the class, as you would for any other function. You can choose to filter, modify, or ignore events, passing them through to the normal handler for the event by calling the parent class function with super().

However, imagine you want to catch an event on 20 different buttons. Subclassing like this now becomes an incredibly tedious way of catching, interpreting and handling these events.

Thankfully Qt offers a neater approach to receiving notification of things happening in your application: Signals.

Signals

Instead of intercepting raw events, signals allow you to 'listen' for notifications of specific occurrences within your application. While these can be similar to events — a click on a button — they can also be more nuanced — updated text in a box. Data can also be sent alongside a signal - so as well as being notified of the updated text you can also receive it.

The receivers of signals are called Slots in Qt terminology. A number of standard slots are provided on Qt classes to allow you to wire together different parts of your application. However, you can also use any Python function as a slot, and therefore receive the message yourself.

Load up a fresh copy of `MyApp_window.py` and save it under a new name for this section. The code is copied below if you don't have it yet.

Basic signals

First, let's look at the signals available for our QMainWindow. You can find this information in the Qt documentation. Scroll down to the Signals section to see the signals implemented for this class.

Qt 5 Documentation — QMainWindow Signals

As you can see, alongside the two QMainWindow signals, there are 4 signals inherited from QWidget and 2 signals inherited from Object. If you click through to the QWidget signal documentation you can see a .windowTitleChanged signal implemented here. Next we'll demonstrate that signal within our application.

Qt 5 Documentation — Widget Signals

The code below gives a few examples of using the windowTitleChanged signal.

Try commenting out the different signals and seeing the effect on what the slot prints.

We start by creating a function that will behave as a ‘slot’ for our signals.

Then we use .connect on the .windowTitleChanged signal. We pass the function that we want to be called with the signal data. In this case the signal sends a string, containing the new window title.

Qt Signal Slot Thread

If we run that, we see that we receive the notification that the window title has changed.

Qt Signals And Slots Tutorial

Events

Next, let’s take a quick look at events. Thanks to signals, for most purposes you can happily avoid using events in Qt, but it’s important to understand how they work for when they are necessary.

As an example, we're going to intercept the .contextMenuEvent on QMainWindow. This event is fired whenever a context menu is about to be shown, and is passed a single value event of type QContextMenuEvent.

To intercept the event, we simply override the object method with our new method of the same name. So in this case we can create a method on our MainWindow subclass with the name contextMenuEvent and it will receive all events of this type.

If you add the above method to your MainWindow class and run your program you will discover that right-clicking in your window now displays the message in the print statement.

Sometimes you may wish to intercept an event, yet still trigger the default (parent) event handler. You can do this by calling the event handler on the parent class using super as normal for Python class methods.

This allows you to propagate events up the object hierarchy, handling only those parts of an event handler that you wish.

However, in Qt there is another type of event hierarchy, constructed around the UI relationships. Widgets that are added to a layout, within another widget, may opt to pass their events to their UI parent. In complex widgets with multiple sub-elements this can allow for delegation of event handling to the containing widget for certain events.

However, if you have dealt with an event and do not want it to propagate in this way you can flag this by calling .accept() on the event.

Qt Signal Slot Between Classes Chart

Alternatively, if you do want it to propagate calling .ignore() will achieve this.

Qt Signal Slot Example

In this section we've covered signals, slots and events. We've demonstratedsome simple signals, including how to pass less and more data using lambdas.We've created custom signals, and shown how to intercept events, pass onevent handling and use .accept() and .ignore() to hide/show eventsto the UI-parent widget. In the next section we will go on to takea look at two common features of the GUI — toolbars and menus.